This is really going green !

Going green is a hot topic these days but this gives a whole new meaning to the topic and may be a bit "over the top". The complete article from the Connecticut news report has been included here...

The Middletown Press
March 26, 2007
Jeff Mill, Press Staff

Green top suggested for Lowe's building

CROWMELL - An environmental analysis of the proposed Lowe's store has suggested the store have a "green" roof - have grass, plants, and/or flowers growing on the roof.

Lowe's is preparing to resubmit its application to build a 152,000 square-foot store on the north side of Route 372. The North Carolina-based home improvement company is scheduled to go before the Inland Wetlands Commission Wednesday as it renews its request for approval.

A similar proposal last year fell just short of approval.
As part of the preparation for the submission to Inland Wetlands, a copy of the Lowe's proposal was submitted to the Connecticut River Coastal Conservation District for review and comment.

The district responded with a four-page analysis of the proposal, and included a series of recommendations intended to reduce the amount of storm water runoff that is discharged into surrounding water courses.

Included in the analysis, near the top of page 3, is a suggestion that "serious consideration should be given for a vegetated roof...for at least a portion of the building."

The analysis notes the roof of the proposed building is equal to 3.3 acres.
"Vegetation on a roof captures a significant amount (of) rainfall, thereby reducing runoff."

A "green roof" can mean just that a roof painted green. Or, it can mean what is in essence a lawn or a garden growing on the roof.

There is even a Web site - greenroof.com - that explains the concept.

There are two types of green roofs: intensive or extensive, the Web sites explains.
There are also potential real economic values to such a concept: covering a roof with grass or a mix of flowers and grass can serve as natural insulation. It can prevent the breaking down of a standard roof membrane through prolonged exposure to the sunlight and serve as an acoustic barrier to dampen noise.

There are also psychological and aesthetic considerations mentioned which can be achieved through the use of a green roof. But perhaps the greatest benefit comes in tempering the rainfall runoff, the web site suggests.

While the most exotic, the green roof proposal is by no means the only suggestion from the council about how Lowe's - and the town - can minimize the impact of storm water runoff.

The review suggests reducing the number of required parking space and constructing a portion an outdoor display area of a "pervious material" rather than asphalt.

The report proposes that the runoff from the parking lot "will be collected in catch basins or a vegetated swale," while roof runoff will be directed into an underground system that will overflow into Cole Brook."

The council said its recommendations are "intended to help minimize potential adverse impacts such as sedimentation due to uncontrolled soil erosion, the degradation of downstream receiving areas by non-point pollution courses such as road deicers, fertilizers, pesticides and heat/thermal changes," as well as "the loss of stability or function of wetland systems."

The report is intended as an advisory document to assist the town's land-use commissions in their analysis of the plan.

©The Middletown Press 2007

Flourescent bulbs may become the new standard by law

A report in the March 26 N&O pushes the idea of replacing old style incandescent bulbs with new efficient fluorescent ones and discusses a new House bill North Carolina is considering that would eliminate the sale of old style bulbs by year 2016. The article also states "The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that the fluorescent bulbs use two-thirds the energy of incandescents and last up to 10 times longer."

Read the entire article for more news...

News and Observer
March 26, 2007
Ryan Teague Beckwith, Dan Kane, Jane Ruffin and J. Andrew Curliss, Staff Writers

Lawmakers put energy into limits on light bulbs

When Rep. Pricey Harrison saw Al Gore's Oscar-winning documentary "An Inconvenient Truth," a light bulb went on over her head.

It wasn't an incandescent bulb, but a fluorescent.

At the end of the movie, a list of tips on cutting carbon emissions includes switching to the new compact energy-efficient bulbs at home.

Harrison, a Greensboro Democrat, did that. Now she wants to go one step further, and eliminate incandescent bulbs around the state within a decade. Read more...

Replace incandescent bulbs for energy savings

Ever realize that all those incandescent bulbs in your living space give off light at the expense of also giving off a lot of heat? You can save on your energy bill by simply replacing the old bulbs with modern fluorescent bulbs and get more light with considerable energy savings at the same time and the new bulbs even produce the same "color" of light. For example, a new spiral fluorescent bulb gives off the light of a 75 watt bulb and only consumes 19 watts of energy. The new bulb also outlasts 13 incandescent bulbs. Reducing the heat output also reduces the energy air conditioning units must remove from the air during cooling season.

In case you don't like the white light of typical fluorescent bulbs the new spiral bulbs also produce "warm" light that has the look of light from incandescent bulbs. Or you can opt for the white light if you prefer that.

JP

Sequestration of carbon cioxide not affordable for NC power generation

Recent discussions of using "sequestration" to pipe carbon dioxide from coal fueled power plants will not be financially affordable for North Carolina plants. Sequestration is a process of capturing carbon dioxide when it is emitted during the coal burning process and piping it far underground for long term storage under the earth's crust.

"It could cost $4 billion annually to eliminate the carbon dioxide generated by power plants in the Carolinas" according to a report sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy.

The article further states "Coal-fired power plants have become the focus of carbon sequestration efforts because they are the principal emitters, followed by automobiles, office buildings and residential homes. In recent decades, modern industry has devised technologies for trapping pollutants such as fly ash, mercury, sulphur and nitrogen oxides, leaving carbon dioxide as the remaining obstacle to turning coal into a clean fuel."

News and Observer
March 24, 2007
John Murawski, Staff Writer

Clean coal would cost billions
Energy department puts $4 billion annual price tag on cleansing process

It could cost $4 billion annually to eliminate the carbon dioxide generated by power plants in the Carolinas.

The immense cost for cleaning up coal would be equivalent to building two nuclear power plants every year.

That finding comes from a report sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy; the state's utilities reviewed it this week.

"Based on the findings of this report, it seems unlikely geologic carbon capture and storage is a viable option in North Carolina," said Progress Energy spokeswoman Dana Yeganian. Read more...

Fuel from fat

A North Carolina State University professor is working to develop a process to make high-grade fuel from remnants of animal fat. The current procedure is extremely slow - the first months of work has produced about a teaspoonful of the product. Now the work turns to making another two cups of fuel over eight months to power a small engine and prove the concept.

The work has attracted enough attention to get funding to carry the project another step forward and then work on ways to make the process practical for real production. "This is going to be competitive with today's prices for jet fuel, which runs about $2 a gallon," Jeff Hassannia said. "More importantly, it represents a domestic source of fuel at a stable rate that comes from a renewable input.""

Read the article...

Professor making fuel from fat
But the production is very slow so far

News and Observer
March 16, 2007
Tim Simmons, Staff Writer

Bill Roberts can't help but wonder whether his fame and fortune might be found in the greasy remnants of animal fat.

After eight months of work, the N.C. State University researcher has shown he can make high-grade jet fuel from fat that's not even fit to be called lard. Read more...

Pigs are big... business that is

Hog production has grown from a local farming business to a major corporate business in North Carolina. It provides thousands of jobs and produces a large contribution to the state economy and country's food supply and also continues to have considerable impact on the environment in the state.

As cited in the N&O editorial out March 20, 2007, "It's true that Smithfield, its subsidiaries and other producers have stepped smartly away from some of the worst farming practices of their early days. Hog lagoons are now less susceptible to overflows, more care is taken with the spraying of effluent onto fields, and waste-related nitrogen is less likely to pollute streams."

But there is much yet to accomplish to reduce impact on the environment near these production facilities and more needs to be done before allowing major producers to continue expanding and increasing the effects of wastes and insure the environment is protected.

Read the full report...

News and Observer
March 20, 2007
Editorial

Swine time
Smithfield Foods seeks to boost production at its big Bladen County slaughterhouse. Let's have a cleanup first

Pigs are big here. Fueled by phenomenal growth in the 1980s and '90s, this mass-production industry stretches across Eastern North Carolina from sows' confined breeding pens to the world's biggest pork factory. With 19 percent of America's pigs, we're the second-ranking swine state behind Iowa. There are more pigs (nearly 10 million) than Tar Heels.

Yes, pigs are big, and after a shaky start tainted by environmental catastrophes and public complaints, it looks as if the industry is here to stay. But if we're going to live with this business, the business must become easier to live with. Read more...

Horticulture a high value business in NC

Landscaping and lawn care represents a large contribution to North Carolina's economy. A study issued this week indicates that value was $8.6 billion dollars in 2005. There is no doubt that the value will be higher for 2006 and 2007 due to the continuing boom in housing and trend for new homeowners to hire professional landscapers to dress up their property.

News and Observer
March 14, 2007
John Murawski, Staff Writer

Horticulture is worth $8.6 billion a year
Landscaping, tree farms, nurseries, lawns

North Carolina's booming horticulture sector is driven largely by landscaping and lawn care.

The total spent on such services in the state was $8.6 billion in 2005, according to a study issued Tuesday.

The General Assembly provided $150,000 for the study to help understand the horticulture industry's diversity and importance to the state economy. The study, the first to quantify the industry, could yield clues about the best ways to boost economic development, sponsors said.

The horticultural industry includes plant nurseries, florists, arborists, landscapers and irrigation that thrive amid rapid growth and development.

Golf courses and institutional clients are big customers, but residential homes account for two-thirds of the spending on these types of services. Read more...

Keepin it green with gardening in NC

Steve Troxler, state Agriculture Commissioner said in a recent news article about the "green industry in North Carolina" “We always knew the green industry was big business in North Carolina, but we didn’t know how big.” The plant business is big business in NC and includes all sorts of job resources - "greenhouses, nurseries, florists, sod producers, landscapers, irrigation contractors, lawn and garden centers, and Christmas tree farmers".

News and Observer
March 13, 2007
John Murawski, Staff Writer

N.C. plant biz pumps in $8.6B yearly

North Carolina’s plant and garden industry contributes about $8.6 billion a year to the state’s economy, according to a study released today by the state Department of Agriculture.

The industry comprises greenhouses, nurseries, florists, sod producers, landscapers, irrigation contractors, lawn and garden centers, and Christmas tree farmers.

The study concluded that the industry employs 152,000 people statewide and includes 120,741 acres in production. The average homeowner spends about $838 a year on lawn and landscape expenses.

“We always knew the green industry was big business in North Carolina, but we didn’t know how big,” Agriculture Commissioner Steve Troxler said in a statement. Read more...

Stop the phonebooks, save the paper

Tired of getting phone directories dropped at your home every month or so? There may be a solution.

It wastes paper to throw them away and they would just end up in a landfill. The books are difficult to recycle because of the low grade paper used in printing them and they contain a heavy duty glue that causes problems in the recycling process.

One lawmaker has proposed a solution: a do-not-deliver registry, just like the one for junk mail. Sen. Janet Cowell, a Raleigh Democrat, has proposed a bill to require each directory provider to have a hot line for stopping delivery. She says this would reduce waste, save governments the cost of recycling and end the problem of phone books left rotting on the pavement.

A news story describes the problem and possible solutions...

News and Observer
March 13, 2007
Ryan Teague Beckwith, Staff Writer

Hold the phone books, lawmaker asks

Let your fingers do the walking? These days, it's more like let your arms do the carrying -- straight to the recycling bin. With the directory business booming, many North Carolinians are annoyed at phone books littering lawns and driveways.

A state lawmaker has the solution: a do-not-deliver registry, just like the one for junk mail. Sen. Janet Cowell, a Raleigh Democrat, has proposed a bill to require each directory provider to have a hot line for stopping delivery. She said it would reduce waste, save governments the cost of recycling and end the problem of phone books left rotting on the pavement. "I bet you 25 percent of my neighbors haven't picked theirs up," Cowell said. Read more...

Renovating for energy efficiency and helping the environment

The U.S. Green Building Council established the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (or LEED) Green Building Rating System to promote construction of environmentally friendly and energy efficient buildings in 2001. Many builders are incorporating these environmentally friendly practices into new construction but have also found using the practices in renovation of older structures is just as attractive.

Cherokee CEO Tom Darden says "We need to be thinking about the environmental impact of what gets built and energy use and energy waste. This is one place where we thought we could do something about it."

News and Observer
March 12, 2007
Jack Hagel, Staff Writer

Old outside, green within
Tenants renovate space with energy efficiency and the environment in mind

RALEIGH - With its waterless urinals, motion-detecting lights and formaldehyde-free-plywood recycling bins, the future headquarters of Cherokee Investment Partners has all the earmarks of a brand new "green" building -- the kind more developers are touting these days as they get in touch with Mother Earth.

But the bones of the 21,500-square-foot office are anything but new. The office is in a sprawling brick building that dates to 1870.

Cherokee is among a growing number of tenants converting leased space in old buildings to environmentally friendly offices. Read more...

Friends with the environment

Green is "in" and companies are looking for ways to move into green efforts and become more environmentally friendly. Bank of America, Wal-Mart, Expedia.com and others are offering products and services that help the environment and are working toward finding ways to reduce energy consumption.

These changes are good for the companies, good for business and are helping businesses be more socially responsible...

News and Observer
March 10, 2007
Sue Stock, Staff Writer

More companies making friends with environment

U.S. businesses traditionally weren't known as staunch protectors of the environment. But an increasing number of them are putting their clout -- and their money -- into green efforts.

Just this week, Bank of America announced a 10-year, $20 billion initiative to support and offer products and services that help the environment.

Retailers such as Wal-Mart are experimenting with green stores and pledging to reduce their energy and gasoline use.

Other companies including Expedia.com and computer maker Dell are asking customers to pay a few dollars extra to offset the carbon emissions produced by their plane flight or to build their computer. Read more...

Ethanol fuel from sweet potatoes and grass

NC State University plans to turn a laboratory method for turning sweet potatoes and grass into ethanol into a sustainable process that could further help produce "renewable" fuel and eventually lead to creation of more jobs in the state.

The following article released March 8, 2007, explains how the university will try to build a production facility and try to make the proposal a reality...

News and Observer
March 8, 2007
Tim Simmons, Staff Writer

Turning potatoes, grass into ethanol
NCSU gets $1.5 million for test plant

Researchers at N.C. State University already know they can make ethanol from sweet potatoes and switchgrass.

They don't know if they can do it day after day in quantities more meaningful than a lab beaker.

A $1.5 million grant, announced Wednesday by the Golden LEAF Foundation, could help them figure it out.

NCSU will use the money to build a pilot plant capable of making ethanol from products commonly found in the state, such as loblolly pine, sweet potatoes and switchgrass -- a tall, dense grass often used as field cover. Read more...

Wind turbine and renewable energy

The debate continues about the value of wind turbines in the creation of renewable energy. The news article below from January, 2005, points out that the wind turbines near Tracy, California, have been steadily turning out clean energy for twenty years but also that the "massive fiberglass blades on the more than 4,000 windmills have been chopping up tens of thousands of birds that fly into them, including golden eagles, red-tailed hawks, burrowing owls and other raptors."

Clearly there is a collateral cost to using alternative sources of energy and not everyone realizes this when they hear how much the projects contribute to regional energy needs. The segment below from the USA Today report provides some insight into what has been done to resolve issues in the California project.

USA Today
January 5, 2005
John Ritter

ALTAMONT PASS, Calif. — The big turbines that stretch for miles along these rolling, grassy hills have churned out clean, renewable electricity for two decades in one of the nation's first big wind-power projects.

But for just as long, massive fiberglass blades on the more than 4,000 windmills have been chopping up tens of thousands of birds that fly into them, including golden eagles, red-tailed hawks, burrowing owls and other raptors.

After years of study but little progress reducing bird kills, environmentalists have sued to force turbine owners to take tough corrective measures. The companies, at risk of federal prosecution, say they see the need to protect birds. "Once we finally realized that this issue was really serious, that we had to solve it to move forward, we got religion," says George Hardie, president of G3 Energy. Read more...

Is biodegradeable clothing in your future?

Could biodegradeable clothing be in your future and save jobs in the US? NC factories are now manufacturing scarves and socks from a corn-based fabric to help reduce impact on our environment.

Here's the report from WIS TV in Hickory, NC...

North Carolina company making biodegradable clothing
February 5, 2007
Bryce Mursch - WISTV, NBC

(Hickory, NC-NBC) Feb. 5, 2007 - Clothing made from corn could be saving hundreds of North Carolina textile jobs from heading overseas. Four North Carolina factories now produce socks and scarves from a corn-based fabric.

The machines humming at Catawba Valley Community College may be spinning the next hot seller in socks. That's where textile plants send newly developed fabric for testing as US companies try to figure out how to fend off foreign competition.

"It's hard to predict what the consumer is going to buy or what's going to be the hot thing next," said Dan Saint Louis. He runs the hosiery technology center in Hickory, a lab that recently perfected the latest invention in clothing fabric made from corn.

Jerry Collins with Twin City Knitting said, "It's a new yarn that we're introducing, but we're very pleased in the interest that people are showing it."

Four North Carolina companies now produce clothing made from ingeo, the patented cloth that looks and feels like cotton, but is actually a man made fiber derived from plant sugars. The fabric is biodegradable and has become a big seller in Japan.

"They are very very environmentally conscious. They don't have places for anything extra in their landfill," said Dan Saint Louis.

Scientists have also developed clothing made from bamboo and crab shells, a niche in manufacturing that companies say will save jobs and is creating room for expansion in a very competitive industry.

"It would be hard to compete with us," said Dan. "That's the name of the game for us."

You'll pay between eight and nine dollars for a pair of socks made from corn.

Several department stores including Nordstrom and REI now sell this and deals are in the works with other major department stores.

Not always easy being green

Taking the high road is not always the easiest thing to do.

A news article in the February 26, 2007, News and Observer about a proposed "10-story Greenbridge condominium and retail project in downtown Chapel Hill will conserve energy and resources. It will have geothermal heating, planted rooftops and a system that uses rainwater to flush toilets."

Exerpt from the article...

February 26, 2007
News and Observer
Lisa Hoppenjans, Staff Writer

Developer: It's not easy being green
Eco-friendly condos face vote

CHAPEL HILL - In August 2002, Tim Toben found himself three hours north of Reykjavik, fishing for atlantic salmon knee-deep in a glacial stream.

Toben, a former corporate CEO, had been invited to Iceland by Bill McDonough, a green architect whom Time magazine hailed as a "Hero for the Planet." The other guests included a former chemist for Greenpeace and the head of a British solar electric company. They fished during the day. In the evening, they broke out wine and talked shop.

"What became really clear to me on that trip was that global warming is the greatest challenge and threat that humanity has ever faced," Toben said. "The next conversation was what we each could do." Read more...

Another strike against smokers

A major apartment fire this week in Raleigh, North Carolina, is caused by discarded "smoking material" according to investigators quoted in the following news item. This points out yet another significant reason to work toward reducing or eliminating smoking. This again underscores the view that smokers just don't care about others around them and do careless things like throwing out cigarette and cigar butts without concern for the consequences.

The following is from a story line in the News and Observer...

February 24, 2007
News and Observer

Barbara Barrett and Sarah Lindenfeld Hall, Staff Writers

'Smoking material' blamed for blaze
Dozens forced to flee and leave their possessions return to find ashes, rubble, investigators -- and condolences

RALEIGH - Investigators said Friday that a cast-aside bit of "smoking material" ignited one of the worst conflagrations in Raleigh's history, a five-alarm fire that wiped out a budding townhouse community and left 26 families homeless.

Residents returned Friday to the charred remains of their sofas, photographs and shoes, and wrestled with the unsettling reality of their homelessness.

"It's bad when you wake up in the morning and you don't have underwear to put on," said Ryan Richardson, 24, as he waited to get back into his townhouse. "Everything, you take for granted. You automatically get up, take a shower, shave. You can't do that anymore." Read more...

Cheney downplays global warming

Our Vice President has taken a stand against current views on global warming, placing him squarely at odds with the majority of climate scientists. As usual the policy with this administration is to admit nothing and not address many real issues facing the nation.

Much of the current thinking by experts suggests that the global warming trend is being caused by mankind through the burning of fossil fuels. Without significant changes this trend could continue and alter living conditions as we know them.

From ABC News as reported from Sydney, Australia February 23, 2007...

EXCLUSIVE: Cheney on Global Warming
Vice President's Views At Odds With Majority Of Climate Scientists
Sydney, Australia, Feb. 23, 2007

In an exclusive interview today, ABC's Jonathan Karl asked Vice President Dick Cheney about the topic of global warming, a subject Mr. Cheney has rarely addressed in the past. The vice president agreed that the earth is warming but, like President Bush, maintained there is debate over whether humans or natural cycles are the cause-- a position that puts the administration at odds with the vast majority of climate scientists.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- made up of thousands of scientists from around the world -- reported earlier this month they are more certain than ever that humans are heating earth's atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels. In Australia, for example, the IPCC said that rising ocean temperatures brought on by global warming could make Australia's Great Barrier Reef "functionally extinct" by 2050.

Here is a portion of the transcript from Jonathan Karl's conversation with Mr. Cheney:

JONATHAN KARL: I want to ask you about another issue that's been a subject of controversy here in Australia, global warming. Did you get a chance to see Al Gore's movie?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: I have not seen Al Gore's movie.

JONATHAN KARL: Doesn't surprise me.

THE VICE PRESIDENT: He didn't invite me to the showing.

JONATHAN KARL: The premiere, huh?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Not that I had planned to go anyway.

JONATHAN KARL: But what's your sense, where is the science on this? Is global warming a fact? And is it human activity that is causing global warming?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Those are the two key questions. I think there's an emerging consensus that we do have global warming. You can look at the data on that, and I think clearly we're in a period of warming. Where there does not appear to be a consensus, where it begins to break down, is the extent to which that's part of a normal cycle versus the extent to which it's caused by man, greenhouse gases, et cetera.

But I think we're going to see a big debate on it going forward. But it's not enough just to sort of run out and try to slap together some policy that's going to "solve" the problem. Kyoto I think was not a good idea -- not adequate to task. It didn't cover nations like China or India. It would have done serious damage to our economy. We decided not to go down that road. The Senate had rejected it overwhelmingly anyway.

But what we're doing with research, we're spending more money on research than anybody else, probably the rest of the world combined in this area. We've set targets for ourselves in terms of increasing energy efficiency, that is reducing the amount of energy per unit of output. And we're doing better at meeting those targets than I think virtually anybody who signed up with Kyoto. Most of the folks who signed up with Kyoto are not going to meet the targets.

But going forward, if we are going to have a policy, we've got to find ways to do that are not inconsistent with economic growth. You can't shut down the world economy in the name of trying to eliminate greenhouse gases. But there are some answers out there -- nuclear power, for example, is one of them. And getting the United States back into the nuclear power game I think would be a significant benefit -- both in terms of producing the energy we need, but at the same time not contributing to greenhouse gas emissions.

JONATHAN KARL: So you think the jury is still out about whether or not this warming we're seeing has been caused by human activity?

THE VICE PRESIDENT: Some of it has, I think. But exactly where you draw the line? I don't know. I'm not a scientist. I talk with people who supposedly know something about it. You get conflicting viewpoints. But I do think it is an important subject, and it will be addressed in the Congress. I think there will be a big debate on it in the next couple of years.

Copyright © 2007 ABC News Internet Ventures

Build a green pc...

Your PC contributes to global warming and to a degree (no pun intended) helps run up your electric bill. An article from PC Magazine compares energy requirements of several home appliances including your PC and monitor.

One way to help address the issue is to buy a new PC that was manufactured with "green" concepts in mind. Another is to build your own green pc. How to do this is described in this article...

PC Magazine
January 31, 2007
By John Brandon

Global warming is caused by emissions of carbon dioxide, which trap heat so it can't escape the atmosphere. Although cars, factories and power plants do most of the damage, the computer is at least partly to blame. A PC uses 200 to 400 watts, depending on its configuration and use. By comparison, a refrigerator uses about 725 watts, but a DVD player uses only 25 watts, and your TV is right around 100 watts. A high-performance gaming rig with a powerful graphics card, multiple hard drives and optical drives, a flash memory reader, and a 30-inch LCD might consume as much as 750 watts! Leave such a beast running constantly and you might see an extra $40 to $50 on your monthly electrical bill. Ouch.

Yet PC energy consumption is only part of the problem. The manufacturing process for computer parts also has an effect. The typical computer these days contains significant amounts of lead, which is used in soldering motherboards, processors, and other parts. Since the average lifespan of a PC is just three years—according to the EPA—the toxic effects of disposal are quite high. Read more...

School can be warm and friendly

Wake Technical Community College is following Greensboro's lead to show that that school can be friendly to the environment and be a warm and comfortable place for students. Northern Guilford in Greensboro, which opened in late January, is the latest and most extensive example of environmentally friendly school design in the state. Expanding on the concept, Wake Technical Community College is constructing an entire campus where all buildings meet recognized standards of the U.S. Green Building Council. Next year, students will attend classes in the first two buildings on the new northern campus. It will be the state's first green community college campus.

From the 2/11/07 News and Observer

Eco-friendly school has lessons built in
By Wade Rawlins, Staff Writer

GREENSBORO - The first thing people notice in the newly opened
Northern Guilford Middle School is the light. Soft, warm light. It bounces off the roof and pours into classrooms through south-facing windows. It bathes the gymnasium in the sunlight of an outdoor playing field.

"The light is wonderful," said Jane Van Middlesworth, a band teacher. "You know how it feels when you're outside -- it's warm and energizing. I think all schools should be like this." Read more...

Smokers just don't care

Trying to stomp out smoking in public places always brings out strong feelings on both sides. It really would make public places nicer for everyone if a simple ban could be put in place to eliminate smoking. Everyone would benefit from it.

The North Carolina Legislature is trying once again this year to eliminate smoking in all state owned buildings to help improve everyone's health. Since this is a tobacco state no doubt this will bring out a barrage of negative comments from all as the debate proceeds.

Some of the well known smoking issues:

• Smoking causes cancer and other health problems
• Second hand smoke contributes to sickness in non-smokers
• Smokers litter - flip butts on the ground, out car windows, anywhere that's easy
• Smokers dump auto ash trays in the road
• Smokers waste LOTS of money on cigarettes
• Smoke always drifts from smoking areas into non smoking areas
• Smokers care absolutely nothing about health of other people

The following exerpt is from a simple statement typical of a non-smokers view reported in the February 4, 2007, Pantagraph daily newspaper in central Illinois that immediately triggered a round of nasty comments back and forth in the community. Sample comments from their viewers are included...

From the Pantagraph in central Illinois




Smoking ban triggers a problem with litter

Sunday, February 4, 2007 12:44 AM CST

The recent non-smoking ban passed has been awesome. It has a flaw. I have noticed cigarettes droppings in several locations around town. What can be done to keep America clean.

Brenda F.
Lexington

Copyright © 2006, Pantagraph Publishing Co. All rights reserved.

Note: All views and opinions expressed in reader comments are solely those of the individual submitting the comment, and not those of the Pantagraph or its staff.

Sample reader responses...

Well........ wrote on February 05, 2007 3:19 PM
It annoys me to see all the chewing gum that is on the sidewalks and everywhere else. Let's ban chewing gum too. It's full of sugar and bad for teeth. Isn't that a health hazard too?????

Jipsi wrote on February 05, 2007 1:04 PM
You said, "Since the ban evicted a large paying clientele from the businesses that needed them." I'd like to know who has been "evicted?" From what I have read, the "paying clientele" who went to these places prior to the smoking ban, are still alowed at the very same places they've always gone.

lightning wrote on February 05, 2007 12:56 PM
while we're banning smoking from parks, lets go ahead and ban lightning too because that is the cause of most forest fires. Bad God!

to Life is good wrote on February 05, 2007 12:48 PM
so to para-phrase- nothing about the ban can be negative, nothing is bad except smokers. The ban is good, I am good, smokers evil. Just wanted to get your position clear. By the way what are you popping to live in such a dream world??

excuse me wrote on February 05, 2007 12:39 PM
have you looked at new cars in the last 10 years? They have been made with out ashtrays! As far as outside the resturants they have been that way for years. We had ashtrays inside.. All I have to say is hush up, and quit trying to be a saint, I am sure you have tossed something on the ground from time to time, just don't blame us!

Wake up people wrote on February 05, 2007 12:27 PM
Stop whining about the cigarette butts. If you are truly worried about litter worry about the other items that make up 99% of litter. Oh wait - you just want to blame everything on smokers......The Iraq war? Must be the smokers!! The raising of our electric rates? It's those dang smokers!!! The Bears losing the Superbowl? If only the smokers weren't around we would have won!!!! Yes, you sound this stupid!!

Woodford Pundit wrote on February 05, 2007 10:28 AM
The obvious solution to this perceived problem is a ban on littering. Oh, wait; I guess there already is. Isn't there a fine or something. Oh, wait; same thing as with the smoking ban. Perhaps a ban on banning would solve the whole thing, since the ban on littering hasn't worked out so well. Seems to be an enforcement problem. Oh, wait; that's right, we can enlist citizens at large to enforce these things on other citizens. Yep, that should do it. Posses to enforce the littering and smoking bans. That's what I was trying to say.

Smokey wrote on February 05, 2007 9:59 AM
The problem with cigarette smokers littering is not a new issue. Smokers have ashtrays in their cars but usually choose to flick it out the window (wouldn't want that nasty smell in their car of course). Some who don't mind the smell, will wait until the ashtray is full and then empty it at a stoplight. Looks real nice especially after it rains and forms a clump of butts. But my favorite thing about smokers is when they smoke at restaraunt and enjoy a nice smoke before or after a meal. They take a nice big drag off the cigarette and then exhale their smoke over their shoulder, away from THEIR faces and others at THEIR table. Stupid smoking ban, now if I want to smoke, I'll have to buy my own cigarettes.

IL is not your ashtray wrote on February 05, 2007 9:01 AM
This needs to be the state's slogan to smokers. Too many smokers are disrespectful or ignorant of their littering. Smokers, stop making yourselves look like a fool and contain you butts. Illinois is not your ashtray!

Duh wrote on February 05, 2007 8:44 AM
What did you expect? You told us to go smoke outside, so we did. I've noticed a great many places since the ban that haven't added anywhere outside to place a cigarette when you're done smoking it. Others have a can for butts but since it's still right next to the door it's actually illegal to smoke anywhere near it. Smokers pointed out that this would be one of the effects of an indoor smoking ban, but no one listened.

no difference wrote on February 05, 2007 7:03 AM
Smokers threw their trash around before the joke of a ban, too. They've always been inconsiderate litterbugs who think their addiction is above littering laws. If there's no trash can in front of a store, go find one, or, here's a thought - don't smoke on your way there! But no, you're too addicted and have to have your fix. How's this - say I can't drive home without stuffing a cheeseburger in my mouth, so I'll be sure to throw the wrappers in your yard because I don't want to dirty up my car.

Grow up folks wrote on February 04, 2007 10:14 PM
Take responsibility for your mess. Why should I clean up after you? I don't like seeing butt trash all over. So you want to leave it to the stores, bars to clean up after you. Great, let them raise their prices so they can pay someone to be your maid. Didn't your Mom's teach you how to clean up after your selves. Is leaving trash your childish why to get back at someone for the ban? Who's it hurting. Not the B/N aldermans, board members or mayors. Only visitors. What a lovey site for them to view. You act like Bloomington/Normal is the only place to have restrictions on smoking. We are really behind many states. 22 state have a smoking ban in all public places 17 states have restriction on smoking in public places (IL) 12 state has no smoking ban\restrictions AZ, IN, KY, MS, NC, NM, OH C TN TX,WV, WY You should consider relocating to one of the above states. You can smoke all day, still leave your trash for someone else, but at least it wouldn't be here.

LittleMac wrote on February 04, 2007 4:22 PM
Geez, Brenda had me worried. I've been out in the yard for a couple of hours picking up plastic pop bottles, beer cans, Big Mac wrappers, homework assignments, bubble gum wrappers, styrofoam insulation, used arena tickets, and what's left of the latest edition of the 'Prima Donna Post'. Then I came in and read Brenda's letter. About 'droppings' and how a 'non-smoking ban' had been passed. I hadn't heard of that one and was not looking forward to having to smoke. Now, after reading these posts, I'm relieved that everyone in B/N will not have to smoke. Thank you to whomever didn't make us start to smoke. But, I'm worried worried that Lexingtonites may think they will all have to light up this afternoon. Just in time for the Super Bowl. And are thinking that, thanks to Brenda, the ban on the 'non smoking ban' may not be the ban they originally thought was not being banned.

Li'l Johnny wrote on February 04, 2007 12:15 PM
Here is what the Bloomington City Code, Chapter 38 : Section 21 : Litter Prohibited - Penalty, says about littering: It shall be unlawful for any person, in person or by his agent, employee or servant to cast, throw, sweep, sift or deposit in any manner in or upon any street, alley, sidewalk, public right-of-way or other publicly-owned property in the city, or in or upon any river, public water, drain, sewer or basin within the City, any kind of litter. Nor shall any person cast, throw, sweep, sift or deposit any litter anywhere within the City in such manner that it may be carried or deposited, in whole or in part, by the action of the sun, wind, rain or snow, into any of the aforementioned places. Any person violating any of the provisions of this section shall be fined not less than $100.00 nor more than $500.00 for each offense. (Ordinance No. 2004-62) I would love to see a few $100.00 tickets written. The word would get around and maybe, just maybe the trash and litter problem might abate a little. (We have met the enemy and he is us!)

Attorney wrote on February 04, 2007 6:58 AM
More cigarette butts, and empty cigarette packages, have now been added to the litter that some people throw out for others to clean up. It is nothing new to see people throw a butt out of a car window, but neither is seeing someone discard an empty beer can, a soft-drink cup, or occasionally a whole bag of refuse. Some people just don't care about their environment or that others will have to clean up after them. Others may be angry about the smoking ban and throwing their butt down is their way of getting back at a community that "wronged" them. Business owners affected by the ban should make provision for a butt receptacle, but some may see it as not being their law or responsibility. When State Farm first started its indoor ban 15 years ago, smokers could be seen standing along Regency Drive and they just threw down their butts onto the sidewalk. "Like a good neighbor", State Farm did try putting receptacles out and did periodically clean up the mess, but eventually moved the smoking area closer to its building. Maybe Bloomington’s "beer gardens" are a good idea from a housekeeping perspective.

jipsi, Can't Resist: The Answer wrote on February 04, 2007 6:06 AM
What can be done? I have the ANSWER. Repeal the silly, over-micro-managing ban and allow BUSINESSES to, once again, provide a warm, safe place for THEIR CUSTOMERS to relax and enjoy a sportscast, a noisy band, the dingy surroundings, a blue collar game of pool, a beer and a smoke, if they so desire. The smokers have a place to go, the non-smokers have places THEY can go (there WERE restaurants and taverns ALREADY catering to a non-smoking base of regulars) and the streets are cleaner and sidewalks quieter, less littered... "

jipsi wrote on February 04, 2007 5:59 AM
WHOOOOEEEEE! And see how this will only get worse.... Since the ban evicted a large paying clientele from the businesses that needed them, there have been protests about the "dingy" and "smelly" appearance of the abandoned businesses (with demands the businesses self-finance makeovers to 'fix the problems'), complaints about the NOISE (these from people who OBVIOUSLY are just now stepping out and into the nightlife world -- NEWSFLASH: nightclubs and taverns were and always will be loud and noisy places, the healthier the business, the bigger the crowds, the more noise, REGARDLESS of smoking/non-smoking patrons... stick to the COFFEE HOUSES and JUICE BARS if you need PEACE and QUIET, or STAY HOME!) and now, someone bemoans the LITTER of butts from smokers who have had to "take it outside"??? I think the City/County are going to start becoming more and more embarassed by their decision (and the contituents they BELIEVED were the saner), based on the so-silly whimperings that continue amongst this group..."

Selling Green - The Chatham County Way

A January 19th news article about "Selling Green" in the Chapel Hill News and Advocate publication featured a discussion about two realtors working out of Pittsboro that strive to take their work "to the next level".

The article states that Chatham County has long been known as a community that values extra awareness of energy-efficient living, and that the two real estate brokers in Pittsboro have taken that awareness to the next level.

The two agents from Heartwood Realty have received the EcoBroker designation from EcoBroker International, becoming two of the first five Realtors in the state of North Carolina to earn the distinction. Read more...

Rumbles in the night

Ahhh... the railroad. It's an integral part of many communities and a primary means of transportation for many. The railroad has been a part of our culture dating back to well before our lives began. An interesting timeline on the website of the Pacific Southwest Railway Museum lays out early development of the steam engine and other events leading to the beginning of rail transportation that has become a vital part of our society.

Since trains connect or pass through much of our country it's easy to take advantage of rail transportation services - just plan a trip, buy your ticket, go to the local train station and jump on board. If you're going to a metropolitan area you can most likely arrive at a station near your destination and use local transportation to get around.

It's not so easy to talk and work with railroad representatives about how they operate and fit into your own community. Companies operate as if they have the right to do anything needed to carry out their business and expect communities to tolerate the presence of trains, the attendant noise and inconveniences without requiring the railroad company to recognize the need to adjust operations and be good citizens by minimizing noise and avoid blocking auto traffic during busy times of the day.

The small North Carolina town of Apex has always had tracks running right through the middle of the community and trains have always been part of life near the central parts of town. When growing up I remember standing by the tracks and watching the old coal powered locomotives chug through town pulling hundreds of cars transporting freight up and down the east coast. Late at night you could hear locomotives coming from many miles away. You could even use the sounds of trains passing through town as a simple way to tell approximately what time it was much of the day and night.

In modern times the old locomotives have been scrapped or retired to playgrounds and parks and new trains are diesel powered. This has delegated the trails of coal smoke and the characteristic sounds of locomotives pulling up long hills carrying heavy loads of freight into the past. Modern diesel engines bring with them new issues that affect life near the tracks. Rail companies strain to be profitable and generally don't make an effort to be model citizens and minimize impact on life in communities they pass through. In our town and others in the state there are several issues rail companies need to address that affect life in communities they serve.

Issues that immediately surface in many areas are frequent loud bursts of train horn noise, air polution, late night engine idling noise and traffic backups from blocked rail crossings on busy streets. People living near tracks and rail yards will generally see all of these. Folks passing through town might only note the last one.

Long, blaring horn blasts are a constant source of irritation and noise pollution in neighborhoods close to tracks and train yards. In this region at all hours of the day and night long distance trains passing through (Amtrak and freight carriers) start blowing horns miles before arriving in town and repeat horn signals at every crossing all the way through and beyond communities. Obviously there is a need for some of this since it's a safety issue and is required for trains approaching crossings, but it no less provides a constant source of noise for neighborhoods that extends for blocks from the rails. Limited work has been done in a few towns to establish areas called "quiet zones" where sufficient barricade structures have been put in place to prevent cars and pedestrians from crossing tracks when trains are passing by. This concept reduces the need for horns near crossings but the arrangement is expensive and not popular with town officials and rail companies that have to fund such changes. The Town Council in Apex feels that implementing "quiet zones" is far to expensive to be considered and won't commit to even planning this as a future consideration for the community. This leaves the issue of constant train horn noise as issue lacking a solution and neighborhoods are stuck with the problem until enough people demand changes.

A newly recognized issue coming to the forefront now is that of air polution from idling diesel engines. Trains, school buses and other diesel powered vehicles emit diesel fumes in quantities that can accumulate and be harmful to small children and some communities are beginning to press for legal steps to ban leaving diesel engines idling for long periods of time. School buses parked in areas near schools now have to turn engines off to reduce the amount of diesel contaminates emitted into the air. Trains create the same problem but until now this has not gotten much attention until school organizations noted the problem of diesel fume buildup around idling buses. Perhaps now communities can press town and city councils to pass ordinances requiring train engines to be turned off at night or anytime they are left sitting with engines idling to address both the noise issue and reduce diesel fumes drifting through residential and business areas near the tracks.

In times when temperatures are near freezing, trains parked at the end of the work day are routinely left idling all night. This is a general problem in Wake County since trains operate throughout the area. Rail employees argue that diesel engines are hard to start on cold mornings, thus maintain they must be left running all night during cold weather. Attempts to get those responsible for this problem to turn off the engines at night have met with mixed results. The city of Raleigh has had moderate success in getting CSX railroad to turn off engines on cold nights to reduce noise affecting nearby neighborhoods. A procedure has even been put in place to let citizens call in when engines idling noise is heard for periods of time to get train yard personnel to turn off engines until the work day starts. A March 2005 report about CSX train idling noise and polution in Raleigh's Mordecai neighborhood provides notes about efforts to address these problems. This same issue exists in downtown Apex and other towns in Wake County and will probably continue until local citizens and organizations press for local and county wide regulations to address the issues.

The Apex Town Council has not addressed this noise polution problem and CSX railroad operators routinely leave engines idling all night near the center of the town's historic district. This is a constant source of low level noise in homes near the tracks and it can be heard clearly at night two blocks and further away. It's time for the rail companies to be better community citizens and work with local residents to create a better environment for all.

A collateral problem in communities having rail transportation is frequent occurance of rough and dangerous rail crossings left in disrepair producing dangerous crossing conditions. In 2005, after many calls from nearby neighbors to town and rail officials about dangerous, noisy and unsafe crossing issues, the CSX rail group operating in Apex conducted a major overhaul of the crossing at Center Street. For many years timbers supporting the tracks had been left rotting and rails could be seen flexing up and down several inches every time a vehicle crossed the track or a train came through town. Rail spikes were frequently seen poking up two or more inches above the timbers and left so tires could be damaged, again from no effort being made to make repairs. This crossing has been made safe again and at the same time a significant reduction was made in the level of noise made by vehicles crossing the tracks. Several other crossings with significant safety issues still exist (Laura Duncan road, Chatham Street and others). All reveal a lack of railroad concern for safety and reveal an absense of effort to make routine repairs on crossings. Perhaps when a faulty crossing causes a major wreck or a life is lost some attention can be focused on the need for making needed repairs where rails and roads cross all over the county.

Traffic backup problems don't seem to rank high on the list of concerns of CSX officials. Most weekday around traditional rush hour periods long lines of cars generally back up at major road crossings in Apex and other towns. It would seem reasonable for trains to avoid sitting at crossings and moving back and forth in high traffic areas when most commuters are going to or from work but reason doesn't seem to enter into the picture. Moving freight cars around always seems to be done when the most cars are passing through town. Again, this is a case of rail operations placing business ahead of being a responsible part of a community and not working to help make accomodations for everyone.

No doubt trains will remain a part of our society in the foreseeable future and as plans are made to provide even more regional train transportion issues such as these need to be addressed. There are solutions for all these problems that can allow citizens and rail companies to coexist and all share the same if the rail companies are willing to accomodate community needs.

Earth-Friendly Materials Go Mainstream

Building materials are catching on and becoming available to most everyone. In addition to recent availability of eco-friendly foods consumers can easily find a variety of green homebuilding products. Stores offering environmentally materials will gain more business from customers wanting to improve homes and pretect the environment at the same time.

New York times - Home Improvement
January 5, 2006
Ernest Beck


Earth-Friendly Materials Go Mainstream

YOUR local home improvement store may never be the same again.

Annie Marie Musselman for The New York Times

Timothy Taylor, of the Environmental Home Center, envisions a Home Depot in green.

In recent years, an organic food revolution has filled supermarket shelves with products like hormone-free milk. Now, growing consumer interest is encouraging a new generation of green homebuilding retailers. These environmentally conscious stores, which sell such items as eco-timber and insulation made of recycled jeans, are poised to become a national presence. Read more...

"The time is ripe, the market is ready, and the products are mature," said Greg Snowden, the chief executive of Green Fusion Design Center, in San Anselmo, Calif., which opened in 2004.